Determining Plastic Hinge Length in Precast Seismic Force-Resisting Systems

Consulting Engineer, Maryland, USA

Plastic hinges form at the maximum moment region of reinforced concrete columns. A reasonable estimation of the plastic hinge length is key to successfully modeling the lateral load-drift response and conducting a proper seismic performance evaluation of the precast seismic force-resisting systems (SFRS).
Dr. N. Subramanian - Ph.D., FNAE, Consulting Engineer, Maryland, USA

Introduction

Several factors influence the length of plastic hinges. The expressions proposed by Bae and Bayrak (2008) and Subramanian (2009) consider many of these parameters. Most existing expressions do not apply to calculating the plastic hinge length of precast connections with couplers.

A reasonable estimation of the plastic hinge length is key to successfully modeling the lateral load-drift response and conducting a proper seismic performance evaluation of the precast seismic force-resisting systems (SFRS). Plastic hinges form at the maximum moment region of reinforced concrete columns. Determining the plastic hinge length is a critical step in predicting the lateral load-drift response of columns.

As it is difficult to calculate the plastic hinge length using sophisticated computer programs, it is often calculated based on experimental data or using empirical expressions. Several factors influence the plastic hinge length, such as (1) the diameter (db), (2) yield strength of longitudinal reinforcement (fy), (3) the section size (h), (4) level of axial load, (5) moment gradient, (6) the value of shear stress in the plastic hinge region, (7) the amount and mechanical properties of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement, (8) strength of concrete, and (9) level of confinement provided in the potential plastic hinge zone.

Currently Available Expressions for Plastic Hinge Length

Some of the widely adopted empirical expressions are shown in Table 1. The simplified expressions available in the literature do not contain all or most of the aforementioned factors. Hence, large variations exist in the value of plastic hinge length calculated using these empirical equations (Bae and Bayrak, 2008). It may be of interest to note that the plastic hinge length (Lp) usually ranges from 0.25h to 1.0h. Paulay and Priestley (1992) reported that, for all practical columns the value of plastic hinge length will be approximately 0.5h.

Expressions for Plastic Hinge Length


In Table 1, Ag = Gross-area of concrete section, As = Area of longitudinal reinforcement, d = Effective depth, db = Diameter of longitudinal reinforcement, Ec = Modulus of elasticity of concrete, fc^' = Cylinder compressive strength of concrete, fy = yield strength of reinforcement, Gf = Fracture energy of concrete under compression, h = Overall depth of member section, P = Applied axial force, P0 = Nominal axial strength, z = distance from critical section to point of contraflexure, L = Distance from column tip to foundation, ec = Peak compressive strain and e20 = compressive strain at 20% of concrete compressive strength.

The equations suggested by Subramanian (2009) compare favorably with the measured values reported in the paper by Bae and Bayrak (2008). Bae and Bayrak (2008) identified (based on their experiments) the fact that the required length lo at the bottom of the column (over which closely-spaced reinforcement has to be provided) has to be increased from 1.0h (as per ACI 318-05) to a minimum of 1.5h. As per Clause R17.10.2 of current ACI 318-19, the plastic hinge zones are considered to extend a distance equal to twice the member depth from any column or beam face and also include any other sections in walls, frames, and slabs where yielding of reinforcement is likely to occur as a result of lateral displacements. It is interesting to note that the plastic hinge length for structural walls (Eq. (A.10.2a) and (A.10.2b) of ACI 318-19) have been adopted from Paulay and Priestley (1992).

Precast Construction

One of the precast column connections, which has been recently used in connection with accelerated bridge construction (ABC), utilizes mechanical bar splices (commonly referred to as couplers). For ABC, couplers have to be generally used in the plastic hinge region of precast columns. This would violate the current bridge seismic design codes, which do not allow the use of couplers in plastic hinge regions of ductile members.

Expressions for Plastic Hinge Length Figure 1: Effect of mechanical splice on the plastic hinge length (Source: Zhang and Lee, 2024)


The existing empirical expressions of plastic hinge length need to be modified to reflect the effects of relatively large diameters and correspondingly high axial rigidity of couplers used to connect two adjacent reinforcements. These couplers barely deform under tension due to their relatively higher local axial stiffness, resulting in reduced curvatures in the splice region, as shown in Fig. 1(a). The reduced curvature could lead to a shorter plastic hinge length (Zhang and Lee, 2024). In addition, the effects of couplers on lateral drift behavior and plastic hinges are more complex due to the residual slip induced between couplers and connecting reinforcements. Tazarv and Saiidi (2016) recommended a reduced plastic hinge length (Lpsp) for the precast connection with couplers as below:

Expressions for Plastic Hinge Length


Where the term of (1 – Hsp/Lp) reflects the location effect of couplers (Hsp and Lsp are shown in Fig. 1(a)). The value of b has to be determined based on experiments- the rigid length factor (b) is quite low for the test specimens reported in Guan et al., 2021(see Fig. 2(b)). The effect of coupler location is explained in Fig. 1(b) to 1(e) for better understanding. When there is no splice, the plastic hinge will form at the base of the column, as shown in Fig. 1(b). If the reinforcements are mechanically spliced using couplers, as shown in Fig. 1(c), strain concentration occurs, leading to reduced strain above the couplers. As a result, the plastic hinge length above the couplers is necessarily reduced. If the location of couplers is moved up to some distance from the base of the column, but still within the range of base plastic hinge length (Lp), as shown in Fig. 1(d), full plastic hinge length can’t develop. Due to this, the plastic hinge length with couplers (Lpsp) will be lower than the base length of the plastic hinge (Lp). If the couplers are located beyond the base length of the plastic hinge (Lp), then the plastic hinge can be fully developed. In this case, the plastic hinge length with couplers (Lpsp) will be the same as that of the base length plastic hinge (Lp), as shown in Fig. 1(e).

Recently, Zhang and Lee (2024) recommended that the couplers should be kept away from the base of the column at a distance equal to plastic hinge length, so that full development of the plastic hinge is achieved also in mechanically spliced precast connections. If the couplers are designed immediately next to the critical section, small-size couplers should be used to mitigate the detrimental effect of locally higher stiffness. In addition, the relative slip of couplers with rebars should be strictly limited to 0.3 mm. Zhang and Lee (2024) also found that the expression for plastic hinge length by Paulay and Priestley (1992) matched with the test and modeling results of their study.

Plastic hinge length of test and analytical resultsFigure 2: Plastic hinge length of test and analytical results (Source: Zhang and Lee, 2024)

 

Summary and Conclusions

Plastic hinges form at the maximum moment region of reinforced concrete columns. Determining the length of the plastic hinge length is a critical step in predicting the lateral load-drift response of columns. As it is difficult to calculate the plastic hinge length using sophisticated computer programs, it is often calculated based on experimental data or using empirical equations. Different authors have suggested expressions for calculating the plastic hinge length. Several factors influence the length of plastic hinge. The expressions proposed by Bae and Bayrak (2008) and Subramanian (2009) consider many of these parameters. As per ACI 318-19 the plastic hinge zones are considered to extend a distance equal to twice the member depth from any column or beam face. ACI 318-19 adopted the expression of Paulay and Priestley (1992) for the plastic hinge length for structural walls.

However, most of the existing expressions are not directly applicable to calculate the plastic hinge length of precast connections with couplers. Precast column connections may utilize couplers in the plastic hinge region of precast columns, thus, violating the current bridge seismic design codes. These couplers barely deform under tension due to their relatively higher local axial stiffness, resulting in reduced curvatures in the splice region-leading to shorter plastic hinge length. An expression has been suggested in the literature for calculating this shorter plastic hinge length. Anyhow, it is recommended that the mechanical splice should be kept away from the base of the column at a distance equal to the plastic hinge length (as in Fig.1(e)) so that full development of plastic hinge is achieved in mechanically spliced precast connections also.

References

  • Baker, A. L. L.,(1956). Ultimate Load Theory Applied to the Design of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Frames, Concrete Publications Ltd., London, UK.
  • Sawyer, H. A. (1965) “Design of Concrete Frames For Two Failure Stages,” in Flexural Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete, SP-12, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, pp. 405-437.
  • Corley, W. G., “Rotational Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 92, No. 5, 1966, pp. 121-146. doi: 10.1061/JSDEAG.0001504
  • Mattock, A. H. (1967) “Discussion of “Rotational Capacity of Hinging Regions in Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 93, No. 2, pp. 519-522. doi: 10.1061/JSDEAG.0001678
  • Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1987) “Strength and Ductility of Concrete Bridge Columns Under Seismic Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 84, No. 1, Jan.-Feb., pp. 61-76.
  • Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1992) Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1992.
  • Sheikh, S. A., and Khoury, S. S. (1993) “Confined Concrete Columns with Stubs,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 90, No. 4, July-Aug., pp. 414-431.
  • Coleman, J., and Spacone, E. (2001) “Localization Issues in Force-Based Frame Elements,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 127, No. 11, pp. 1257-1265. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:11(1257)
  • Park, R.; Priestley, M. J. N.; and Gill, W. D. (1982) “Ductility of Square-Confined Concrete Columns,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 108, No. 4, pp. 929-950. doi: 10.1061/JSDEAG.0005933
  • Panagiotakos, T. B., and Fardis, M. N. (2001) “Deformations of Reinforced Concrete Members at Yielding and Ultimate,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, No. 2, Mar.-Apr., pp. 135-148.
  • Bae, S., and Bayrak, O. (2008) “Plastic Hinge Length of Reinforced Concrete Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 3, May-June, pp. 290-300.
  • Subramanian, N. (2009) Discussion on “Plastic Hinge Length of Reinforced Concrete Columns” by Sungjin Bae and Oguzhan Bayrak, ACI Structural Journal, V. 99, No.2, Mar.-April, pp. 233.
  • Berry, M. P.; Lehman, D. E.; and Lowes, L. N. (2008) “Lumped-Plasticity Models for Performance Simulation of Bridge Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 3, May-June, pp. 270-279
  • Zhang, W. and Lee, D. (2024) Effect of Mechanical Splice to Seismic Performance of Precast Column-Foundation Connection, ACI Structural Journal, V. 121, No. 5, Sept., pp.133-146.
  • Tazarv, M., and Saiidi, M. S. (2016) “Seismic Design of Bridge Columns Incorporating Mechanical Bar Splices in Plastic Hinge Regions,”
  • Engineering Structures, V. 124, 2016, pp. 507-520. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.041
  • Guan, D.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J.; Lin, Z.; and Guo, Z. (2021) “Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Columns with Prefabricated UHPC Jackets in Plastic Hinge Zone,” Engineering Structures, V. 245, p. 112776 doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112776
ICCT, November - December 2024

No comments yet, Be the first one to comment on this.

×

Terms & Condition

By checking this, you agree with the following:
  1. To accept full responsibility for the comment that you submit.
  2. To use this function only for lawful purposes.
  3. Not to post defamatory, abusive, offensive, racist, sexist, threatening, vulgar, obscene, hateful or otherwise inappropriate comments, or to post comments which will constitute a criminal offense or give rise to civil liability.
  4. Not to post or make available any material which is protected by copyright, trade mark or other proprietary right without the express permission of the owner of the copyright, trade mark or any other proprietary right.
  5. To evaluate for yourself the accuracy of any opinion, advice or other content.
Thermax Acquires BuildTech to Expand its Footprint in Construction Chemicals

Thermax Acquires BuildTech to Expand its Footprint in Construction Chemicals

The recent acquisition of BuildTech by Thermax exemplifies a significant trend within the industry towards strategic expansion and enhanced capabilities in construction technologies.

Read more ...

Icrete By Amazecrete Enhances Strength & Durability of Concrete

Icrete By Amazecrete Enhances Strength & Durability of Concrete

Icrete has emerged as a new age material for Concrete Construction given its efficacy in increasing the strength and durability of concrete, bringing value additions and greater profitability to the users.

Read more ...

Cement Industry Targets Net Zero with 25% Emissions Reduction by 2030

Cement Industry Targets Net Zero with 25% Emissions Reduction by 2030

The Cement Industry is embarking on a Net Zero pathway, aiming for a 25% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030 and a full decarbonization by 2050, driven by technological innovations, use of alternative raw materials, and circular economy

Read more ...

Properties and Applications of Geopolymer Masonry Blocks

Properties and Applications of Geopolymer Masonry Blocks

Radhakrishna, Professor and Head, Department of Civil Engineering, RV College of Engineering, Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Bengaluru. Block masonry is one of the oldest methods of construction. It is composed

Read more ...

Advancing LC3 Cement Technology for Sustainable Construction in India

Advancing LC3 Cement Technology for Sustainable Construction in India

Dr S B Hegde provides a deep, research-driven analysis of LC3 cement, emphasizing its chemistry, process innovations, global applicability, and success stories, and evaluates its technical advantages, performance, cost savings

Read more ...

Supplementary Cementitious Materials Improving Sustainability of Concrete

Supplementary Cementitious Materials Improving Sustainability of Concrete

Concrete is the second most consumed material after water in the world and cement is the key ingredient in making concrete. When a material becomes as integral to the structure as concrete, it is important to analyze its environmental impacts.

Read more ...

Alite & Belite in Portland Cement: A Key to Sustainability & Strength

Alite & Belite in Portland Cement: A Key to Sustainability & Strength

Dr. S B Hegde guides construction industry stakeholders on balancing cement’s early strength with long-term durability and sustainability and advocates optimized cement formulations and supplementary materials for more resilient infrastructure

Read more ...

Amazecrete: Offering Sustainable Concrete Solutions like ICRETE

Amazecrete: Offering Sustainable Concrete Solutions like ICRETE

V.R. Kowshika, Executive Director, Amazecrete, discusses the economic and environmental benefits of eco-friendly and sustainable products like ICRETE and the positive impact on the construction industry.

Read more ...

Admixture-Cement Compatibility For Self-Compacting Concrete

Admixture-Cement Compatibility For Self-Compacting Concrete

An admixture is now an essential component in any modern concrete formula and plays a significant role in sustainable development of concrete technology. Dr. Supradip Das, Consultant – Admixture, Waterproofing, Repair & Retrofitting

Read more ...

Amazecrete's Icrete: New Age Material for Concrete Construction

Amazecrete's Icrete: New Age Material for Concrete Construction

By maximizing the durability and use of supplementary cementitious materials, Icrete has emerged as a new age material for Concrete Construction V. R. Kowshika Executive Director Amazecrete

Read more ...

Nanospan’s Spanocrete® Reduces Cement & Curing Time in Fly Ash Bricks

Nanospan’s Spanocrete® Reduces Cement & Curing Time in Fly Ash Bricks

Hyderabad-based Ecotec Industries is a leading manufacturer of fly ash bricks and cement concrete blocks in South India under the trademark NUBRIK. Their products are known for their consistency and quality. Ecotec was earlier owned

Read more ...

Ready-Mix Concrete: Advancing Sustainable Construction

Ready-Mix Concrete: Advancing Sustainable Construction

A coordinated approach by the government, industry stakeholders, and regulatory bodies is needed to overcome challenges, implement necessary changes, and propel the RMC sector towards further growth such that RMC continues to play a vital

Read more ...

Advancements & Opportunities in Photocatalytic Concrete Technology

Advancements & Opportunities in Photocatalytic Concrete Technology

Research on photocatalytic concrete technology has spanned multiple decades and involved contributions from various countries worldwide. This review provides a concise overview of key findings and advancements in this field

Read more ...

Self-Compacting Concrete

Self-Compacting Concrete

Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is a special type of concrete which can be placed and consolidated under its own weight without any vibratory effort due to its excellent deformability, which, at the same time, is cohesive enough to be handled

Read more ...

Nanospan's Spanocrete® Additive for Waterproofing & Leak-Free Concrete

Nanospan's Spanocrete® Additive for Waterproofing & Leak-Free Concrete

Nanospan's Spanocrete Additive for Waterproofing & Leak-Free Concrete has proven its mettle in the first massive Lift Irrigation project taken up by the Government of Telangana to irrigate one million acres in the State.

Read more ...

Accelerated Building & Bridge Construction with UHPC

Accelerated Building & Bridge Construction with UHPC

UHPC, which stands for Ultra High-Performance Concrete, is a testament to the ever-evolving panorama of construction materials, promising unparalleled strength, durability, and versatility; in fact, the word concrete itself is a misnomer

Read more ...

Innovative Approaches Driving Sustainable Concrete Solutions

Innovative Approaches Driving Sustainable Concrete Solutions

This paper explores the evolving landscape of sustainable concrete construction, focusing on emerging trends, innovative technologies, and materials poised to reshape the industry. Highlighted areas include the potential of green concrete

Read more ...

GGBS: Partial Replacement Of Cement For Developing Low Carbon Concrete

GGBS: Partial Replacement Of Cement For Developing Low Carbon Concrete

Dr. L R Manjunatha, Vice President, and Ajay Mandhaniya, Concrete Technologist, JSW Cement Limited, present a Case Study on using GGBS as partial replacements of cement for developing Low Carbon Concretes (LCC) for a new Education University

Read more ...

To get latest updates on whatsapp, Save +91 93545 87773 and send us a 'Saved' message
Click Here to Subscribe to Our eNewsletter.