Study of Strength of Concrete vis-à-vis Grades of Cement

Dr. Renu Mathur, Scientist and Head, Dr. A. K. Misra, Scientist and Pankaj Goel, Technical Officer, Rigid Pavement Division, Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi.

Introduction

Cements of different grades viz. 43 OPC (IS–8112)1, 53 OPC (IS-12269)2 and Portland Pozzolana cement (fly ash based), IS-1489 Part I3 etc. with different brand names are available in the market. However, when tested in the laboratory these cements do not give the strength corresponding to their grades in case of OPCs and markings such as 43 MPa 53 MPa on their bags in case of Portland Pozzolana cements.

To design a concrete mix of the desired strength with available materials, the strength of cement is required at 7 days (IRC:44-2008)4 or at 28 days (IS:10262-1982)5. Based on the strength values of cement, w/c ratio is directly read from the available charts given in IRC-44 & IS-10262. By opting the guidelines as per the above mentioned standards, a very good approximation of concrete strength was possible in past but for last couple of years difficulty is being faced in obtaining the desired strength of concrete with the present day cements.

There are cases when the cements of certain grades give more than prescribed strength at 7 days and thereafter a very little gain in their strength is observed till 28 days and in some cases the strength does not reach the level as per the grade. There are also cases, where a 43 grade cement gives 28 day strength matching with 53 grade. Earlier, IS – 2696 satisfied all the requirements of cement in the country. However, there were certain special requirements relating to strength and composition of cement by Railways and Defense at that time and the same were desired to be covered under standardization so that these could be also made available as ISI marked product. Therefore, high strength cements came into picture through IS-8112, OPC – 43 and IS- 12269, OPC- 53 grade to take care of these specific requirements. All the three grades viz. IS 269 (33-grade), IS – 8112 (43 -grade) and IS – 12269 (53 -grade) were ordinary Portland cements.

Besides these three grades of OPC, now there are number of varieties of cements available in the country covered under the IS – 1489 (part I) – 1991, Specification for Portland – Pozzolana Cement (Fly-ash based). Since these PPCs have not been graded, there is no procedure also to check their quality based on their strength at 3,7 or 28 days. Since these cements are fly-ash based, proportions of which are not specified, they do not follow any strength pattern at different ages as is the case with OPCs. The bags containing these cements have the marking IS – 1489 – part I, 43- MPa or 53- MPa. Since IS: 1489 (part I) is formulated to give strength of the order of 33- MPa only, the marking 43- MPa/53- MPa on cement bags is misleading as the consumer can not reject the consignment in the case of lower strength. The erratic behavior of cement w.r.t. their strength and that of concrete mixes suggested a detailed study on available cements.

Objectives & Scope

  • The broad objective of the project was set to study various known brands of cement available in market w.r.t. the strength development of concrete prepared by their use.
  • To simplify the procedure of concrete mix design with the available cements.

Work Plan & Methodology

Different brands of cements and cements of same brand name but from different consignments were procured from local market. These were tested for their compressive strength at 7, 28 and 90 days to study the pattern of strength gain.

With three different brands of cement, concrete mixes were designed as per the existing standards using four different quantities of cement per cubic metre of concrete at different water cement ratios.

The results obtained were analyzed, discussed and suggestions have been given for design of concrete mixes with available cement within reasonable period.

Results & Discussion

The compressive strength of different brands of cements and cements of same brand procured from different consignments are shown at Table 1.

Table 1:
S.No. Details of cement Compressive strength kg/ sq. cm
7 days 28 days 90 days
1. Birla Cement 53 MPa 248 425 468
2. Ambuja Cement 53 MPa 335 510 597
3. Sri Ultra 53 MPa 247 348 400
4. J.K. Cement OPC 43 315 400 425
5. Birla Nirman Cement 53 MPa 361 490 530
6. Birla Samrat 53 MPa 251 530 550
7. Rajshree OPC 53 363 523 545
8. ACC 53 MPa 355 573 590
9. Ambuja 53 MPa 387 527 540
10. Lafarge 53 MPa 227 423 525
11. Lafarge 53 MPa 229 375 470
12. Lafarge 53 MPa 230 350 400
13. Lafarge 53 MPa 250 435 500
14. Lafarge 53 MPa 360 450 475
15. Sri Ram OPC 53 359 519 519
16. Sri Ram OPC 53 377 517 535
17. Sri Ram OPC 53 468 492 500
18. Sri Ram OPC 53 360 400 430
19. Sri Ram OPC 53 448 570 603
20. Sri Ram OPC 53 472 580 590
21. J. K. Sarva Shaktiman OPC 43 268 438 580
22. J. K. Sarva Shaktiman OPC 43 247 430 480
23. J. K. Sarva Shaktiman OPC 43 300 400 490
24. J. K. Sarva Shaktiman OPC 43 370 450 475

From the results it can be seen that these cements do not adhere to the strength requirements as prescribed for either OPCs or PPC (Table 2) by BIS. It can also be seen from the results that though a good number of cements have 7 day Compressive Strength (C/S) below 300 kg/sq. cm, most of them have their 28 day C/S above 400 kg/sq. cm and 90 day C/S up to 500 kg/sq. cm and still above it.

Table 2:
S.No. Cement Type Compressive strength kg/sq. cm
7 days 28 days
1 OPC – 43
(IS – 8112)
330 430
2 OPC – 53
(IS-12269)
370 530
3 PPC
(IS – 1489, Part I)
220 330
From this study it is revealed that these available cements may be used for cement concrete works including pavement quality concrete. Though Portland Pozzolana cements are designed for 33 grade, none of the PPC tested under this study had the strength of this order. The results obtained are very high. The fact, that it is not possible to design a concrete mix of high strength with cements of low strength, there is a tendency among the manufacturers of Portland Pozzolana cements to produce high strength PPCs with the labels such as IS: 1489 (Part I), 43- MPa & IS: 1489 (Part I), 53- MPa to lure the consumer. The dilemma is that in case of not getting strength 43- MPa/53- MPa, consumer can not reject the PPC and in any case he is to use the supplied cement having minimum 7 days compressive strength, 220 kg/sq.cm and 28 days compressive strength, 330 kg/sq. cm. At present when manufacturers of PPC are not grading their product and also the supply of OPC in open market is highly restricted, the consumer is left with the only option to find out ways to use available cements for design of concrete mixes for various applications.

Thus for any project, it has become a difficult task to design a concrete mix. For making the process of designing a concrete mix less cumbersome, based on the present study, a minimum 7 day compressive strength of 250 kg/sq. cm is recommended for cements to be used for pavement quality concrete (PQC).

Three brands of cement were chosen for the study form the list of tested cements. For detailed investigations, a number of cement concrete mixes were designed using four different quantities of cement (360 kg, 380 kg, 400 kg and 420 kg) and various water cement ratios viz. 0.45, 0.50, 0.55 and 0.60. The results are summarized at Tables 3, 4, 5.

Table 3:
J K CEMENT OPC - 43
Cement content per cum
W/c ratio 360 kg 380 kg 400 kg 420 kg
Water content Strength Kg/sq.cm Water Content Strength Kg/sq.cm Water content Strength Kg/sq. cm Water content Strength kg/sq. cm
C/S F/S C/S F/S C/S F/S C/S F/S
28
Day
56
Day
28
Day
28
Day
56
Day
28
Day
28 Day 56
Day
28 Day   28
Day
56
Day
28 Day
0.45 162 - - - 171 490 520 57.0 180 480 512 56.0 189 455 490 51.0
0.50 180 427 480 48.4 190 421 460 50.7 200 396 426 44.0 210 405 445 45.0
0.55 198 358 388 39.5 209 354 384 39.0 220 - - - 231 - - -
0.60 216 295 333 33.0 228 - - - 240 - - - 252 - - -

Table 4:
BIRLA NIRMAN 53 MPa
Cement content per cum
W/c ratio 360 kg 380 kg 400 kg 420 kg
Water content Strength Kg/sq.cm Water Content Strength Kg/sq.cm Water content Strength Kg/sq. cm Water content Strength kg/sq. cm
C/S F/S C/S F/S C/S F/S C/S F/S
28
Day
56
Day
28
Day
28
Day
56
Day
28
Day
28 Day 56
Day
28 Day 28 Day 56 Day 28 Day
0.45 162 - - - 171 470 495 52.0 180 475 500 54.0 189 470 490 52.0
0.50 180 439 480 48.0 190 430 475 46.6 200 398 427 42.0 210 390 420 41.0
0.55 198 393 469 43.6 209 328 393 38.5 220 - - - 231 - - -
0.60 216 350 398 36.5 228 - - - 240 - - - 252 - - -

Table 5:
BIRLA SAMRAT 53 MPa
Cement content per cum
W/c ratio 360 kg 380 kg 400 kg 420 kg
Water content Strength Kg/sq.cm Water Content Strength Kg/sq.cm Water content Strength Kg/sq. cm Water content Strength kg/sq. cm
C/S F/S C/S F/S C/S F/S C/S F/S
28
Day
56
Day
28
Day
28
Day
56
Day
28
Day
28 Day 56
Day
28 Day 28 Day 56 Day 28 Day
0.45 162 - - - 171 480 525 56.0 180 480 527 57.0 189 448 490 50.0
0.50 180 409 466 47.0 190 451 533 54.0 200 405 501 43.5 210 425 445 44.0
0.55 198 381 449 40.0 209 401 468 45.0 220 - - - 231 - - -
0.60 216 364 430 38.5 228 - - - 240 - - - 252 - - -

From the results it can be seen that at same water cement ratio, the compressive and flexural strengths go on decreasing as the cement content increase from 360 kg to 420 kg for water contents above 190 litre per cubic meter of concrete. As the cement content increases at the same water cement ratio, the water content per cubic meter of concrete goes on increasing. In order to restrict the maximum water content per cubic meter of concrete to 190 litre considering the guidelines as suggested in IRC-44 & IS- 10262 (for 20 mm maximum size of coarse aggregate), and greater fineness of available cements, w/c ratio may be selected as 0.50 for 360 and 380 kg cement per cubic meter of concrete and 0.45 for 400 and 420 kg cement per cubic meter of concrete.

Based on the study, a concrete mix can be designed with great ease within minimum reasonable time by following the procedure as outlined below:
  1. Test the cement for 7 day compressive strength. If the compressive strength is greater than 250 kg per sq. cm, select it for concrete mix design.
  2. Design four concrete mixes using
    1. Cement–360 kg; Water–180 litre
    2. Cement–380 kg; Water-190 litre
    3. Cement-400kg; Water–180 litre
    4. Cement-420 kg; Water–190 litre
  3. Prepare all four mixes simultaneously in the laboratory. Check the workability and if required, use super plasticizer. Prepare cube and beam specimens from the mixes to be tested at 28 days.
  4. From the results, the mix may be selected for the desired compressive and flexural strength. Using very low w/c ratio and excessive use of super plasticizers shall be avoided as besides their use being uneconomical, long term effects of these admixtures are not generally known to common users.

Conclusion and Recommendations

  • All the available OPCs and PPCs, irrespective of marking on their bags have 28 days strength above 400 kg/sq. cm . The strength of these cements further increases with time and at 90 days a good number of cements have C/S beyond 500 kg/sq. cm.
  • Since the cements have good strength, these can be used for pavement quality concrete.
  • Portland Pozzolana cements as per IS: 1489 (part – I) were produced for durability of structure rather than for higher strength. Since all the available PPCs are giving high strength, it is high time that the manufactures grade their PPCs.

References

  • IS 8112: 1989 (Reaffirmed 2005) “Specification for 43 grade ordinary Portland cement.”
  • IS 12269: 1987 (Reaffirmed 2008) “Specification for 53 grade ordinary Portland cement.”
  • IS 1489: Part 1: 1991 (Reaffirmed 2005) “Specification for Portland Pozzolana cement Part 1 Fly-ash based.”
  • IS 10262: 1982 (Reaffirmed 2004) “Recommended guidelines for concrete mix design.”
  • IRC: 44-1976 “Tentative Guidelines for Cement Concrete Mix Design for Pavements (for Non-Air Entrained and Continuously Graded Concrete) “.(First Revision).
  • IS 269: 1989 (Reaffirmed 2008) “Specification for 33 grade ordinary Portland cement.”
Concrete Rheology - Unveiling the Secrets of Concrete
Concrete is a heterogeneous composite complex material, and its hardened property is influenced by its fresh property. Concrete today has transformed into an advanced type with new and innovative ingredients added - either singly or in

Read more ...

ICRETE: Making Concrete Economical
ICRETE offers many benefits apart from reducing cement content and giving high grades saving to ready-mix concrete companies; it helps reduce shrinkage and permeability in concrete slabs, increases the durability of concrete, and also works

Read more ...

UltraTech Cement to implement Coolbrook’s RotoDynamic HeaterTM revolutionary technology for industrial electrification
UltraTech Cement Limited, India’s largest cement and ready-mix concrete (RMC) company, and Coolbrook, a transformational technology and engineering company, will jointly develop a project to implement Coolbrook’s RotoDynamic HeaterTM (RDH)

Read more ...

Plastic Shrinkage and Cracks in Concrete
Plastic shrinkage cracking occurs when fresh concrete is subjected to a very rapid loss of moisture. It is caused by a combination of factors such as air and concrete temperature, relative humidity, and wind velocity at the surface of concrete. These can cause

Read more ...

Mechanised way of plastering with spray Plaster Machine
This paper covers the research work carried out on cement plastering process for internal and external building wall by using spray plastering machine. Objective of study is to experiment and compare the plastering activity by conventional way and

Read more ...

Construction Defects Investigation & Remedies
In recent years, the speed of construction has increased very fast; buildings which used to take 3-5 years are now getting completed in 1-2 years. There is a race to complete projects faster, but due to this speedy construction, the quality of construction is often

Read more ...

Challenges in usage of Hydrogen in Cement Industry
With its zero-emission characteristics, hydrogen has become a promising decarbonization path for the cement industry. While there are several issues that need to be resolved in the use of hydrogen, there are also many advantages, so much so that the growth

Read more ...

Enhancing Corrosion Resistance of Steel Bars in Reinforced Concrete Structures
Reinforced concrete is a composite material which is made using concrete and steel bars. Concrete takes the compressive forces and steel bar takes tensile forces. Concrete around the steel bar protects it from corrosion by providing an alkaline environment

Read more ...

Moving toward workability retention to rheology retention with low viscosity concrete technology
Amol Patil, Sr. Specialist - General Manager (Admixture and Specialty Products), Master Builders Solutions (India), and Nilotpol KAR, Managing Director, Master Builders Solutions (South Asia), present a paper on the concept of low viscosity concrete in

Read more ...

Cement industry innovating eco-friendly packaging
Cement companies are constantly innovating to meet global sustainability standards and improve logistics, shelf life, and utility of cement, while reducing wastage. Thei aim is to reduce their environmental impact without compromising their product

Read more ...

IIT Madras uses Solar Thermal Energy to Recycle Waste concrete
Researchers at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras have developed a treatment process using solar thermal energy to recycle construction and demolition debris. Waste concrete from demolition was heated using solar radiation to produce recycled concrete

Read more ...

Textile Reinforced Concrete - A Novel Construction Material of the Future
As a new-age innovative building material, TRC is especially suited for maintenance of existing structures, for manufacturing new lightweight precast members, or as a secondary building material to aid the main building material. Textile Reinforced Concrete

Read more ...

Technological Innovation for Use of Bottom Ash by-product of Thermal Power Plants in the Production of Concrete
The day is not far for the adoption of this innovative, eco-friendly, and cost-effective bottom ash – concrete process technology by construction agencies undertaking road/infrastructure project works, real estate developers, ready mix concrete (RMC) operators

Read more ...

Headed Bars in Concrete Construction
Using headed bars instead of hooked bars offer several advantages like requirement of reduced development length, less congestion, ease of transport and fixing at site, better concrete consolidation, and better performance under seismic loads.

Read more ...

Sustainability of Cement Concrete - Research Experience at CRRI on Sustainability of Concrete from Materials Perspective
It can be said that ever since the publication of the document of World Commission on Environment and Development [1], the focus of the world has diverted towards sustainability. Gro Harlem Bruntland [1] defined sustainable development as “development

Read more ...

Shrinkage, Creep, Crack-Width, Deflection in Concrete
The effects of shrinkage, creep, crack-width, and deflection in concrete are often ignored by designers while designing structural members. These effects, if not considered in some special cases such as long span slabs or long cantilevers, may become very

Read more ...

Concrete Relief Shelve Walls - An Innovative Method of Earth Retention
Relief shelve walls are a unique concept that use only conventional construction materials like PCC / RCC / steel reinforcements, and work on a completely different fundamental to resist the lateral load caused due to soil. Information on the various dimensions

Read more ...

Carbon Neutrality in Cement Industry A Global Perspective
Increasing energy costs, overcapacity, and environmental pollution are the top concerns of the cement industry, which is one of the major contributors to CO2 emissions. Dr S B Hegde, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jain College of Engineering

Read more ...

Finnish company Betolar expands to Indian concrete markets with a cement-free concrete solution
Betolar, a Finnish start-up, and innovator of geopolymer concrete solution Geoprime®, has expanded its operations to Europe and Asian markets including India, Vietnam and Indonesia. Betolar’s innovation Geoprime® is the next-generation, low carbon

Read more ...

Why Fly Ash Bricks Are Better Than Clay/Red Bricks
It is estimated that in India each million clay bricks consume about 200 tons of coal and emit around 270 tons of CO2; on the other hand, with fly ash bricks production in an energy-free route, there are no emissions. Dr. N. Subramanian, Consulting

Read more ...