Analysis of Trough Shaped Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using ANSYS

Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys

L.Andal, Assistant Professor, Civil Engg. Department, Velammal College of Engineering and Technology, Madurai, M.S.Palanichamy, Vice Chancellor, Tamil Nadu Open University, M.Sekar, Dean, College of Engineering Guindy, Chennai, V.Vanitha, Lecturer, Civil Engg. Department, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi

Ferrocement is a composite material made up of cement matrix and reinforcement in the form of multiple layers of mesh. Ferrocement structures are flexible and strong, due to the fact that they are thin and the steel reinforcement is distributed widely throughout the mortar. Though the raw materials required for Ferrocement construction is easily available, it is not widely used in our country due to the non-availability of proper design guidelines/code books. This paper aims at the study on the behavior of Ferrocement beams using ANSYS, finite element software. Finite Element Models have been developed for the trough shaped ferrocement roofing unit. The results obtained using the finite element software is compared with the analytical results computed from the formulae available in the literature and also with the experimental results. Design charts are developed for ferrocement trough unit to serve as an aid for a prospective designer to arrive at a section to suit their requirements.

Introduction

Housing shortage is a well recognized problem in this world. As result of uncontrolled population growth, migration to urban centers and the decay of existing low cost housing units, the cumulative needs of housing of many countries are already beyond easy corrective measures. Development of new materials of construction, low cost housing and accelerated construction methods are some of the different measures that research workers and engineers have been attempting towards meeting this challenge. Studies on building costs show that roofs/floors account for as high as 20-25% of the total building cost and saving in these items will go a long way in reducing the overall cost of a building. Traditionally, either ferrocement or corrugated galvanized iron sheets or asbestos cement sheets are being used for low cost roofing. Ferrocement as a roofing component was conceived in this context. As a composite material made of wire mesh, cement and sand, ferrocement posses unique qualities of strength and serviceability. If a roof/floor system in ferrocement is evolved and adopted on a large scale, it will prove a fitting contribution to housing the millions of homeless in the country.

The following are the analytical and experimental works related to ferrocement. Andal et.al (studied the flexural strength of modified ferrocement with polymer mortar. 45 specimens were tested and the load deflection curves, first crack loads and ultimate loads were analysed to obtain the optimum percentage of polymer to be used in modified ferrocement. Expressions were derived for the plastic moment and First Cracking Moment. Ramesht, M.H.(2) compared various analytical procedures which have been developed to predict the ultimate moment of Ferrocement under flexure. Balaji Rao,(3)proposed two methods to predict the first crack and ultimate moments of Ferrocement elements and concluded that both the methods are found to give satisfactory agreement with test data. Mathews,et.al.(4) studied the analytical and experimental investigations of cracking load, ultimate load, deflection, crack spacing and crack width of hollow ferrocement roofing system. Ramachandra Murthy, D.S(6)studied the applications of Ferrocement as housing units, water tanks, grain silos, roofing components, irrigation channels, boats and marine structures. Damodar Maity, et.al (9)studied the deflection and stress behavior of nine different types of ferrocement roofing elements. From the parametric study, it was found that deflection is less in double T-type of element and more in case of trough shaped element. Principal stresses are less in the segmental shell element and more in case of inverted V–shaped element. On the basis of cost analysis it was found that the shell element is the most economical shape as a roofing element.

Moreover, the theoretical analysis of ferrocement trough shaped elements are very tedious and time consuming. So this paper deals with the analysis of ferrocement elements using ANSYS software.

Objective

The main objective of this work is to develop design charts for the Ferrocement trough units. Design aids are essential and will be of immense help to the majority of the users of ferrocement. Moreover, they will increase consideration of ferrocement as an alternative construction material in various applications. In view of this, design charts are developed using the results obtained from ANSYS for ferrocement trough shaped roof/floor system.

ANSYS (Version 8.0)

ANSYS is a general purpose Finite Element analysis software package. The software implements equations that governs the behavior of these elements and solves them all creating a comprehensive explanation of how the system acts as a whole. This type of analysis is used for solving problems which are too complex to analyze manually.

Details of Trough Element

Trough shaped section with lips as shown in Figure 1 is selected for the roofing element. The cross sectional details are given below.
Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys
  • Span =3.0m
  • Thickness of section, t =20mm
  • Depth of the section, H = 100mm
  • Angle of web with vertical = 59Ú
  • Angle of web with horizontal = 31Ú
  • Characteristic compressive
  • Strength of mortar = 40 N/mm2
  • Moment of inertia, Ig (mm4) = 5956199.0
  • Neutral axis depth Yb =47.5mm
  • Section modulus Z (mm3) = 125393.66

Analysis Using ANSYS

The following steps are involved in analyzing the trough element using the finite element software package ANSYS
  • Element selection
  • Defining material properties
  • Model creation
  • Meshing
  • Applying boundary conditions and loading
  • Analysis
  • Viewing results
The accuracy of the results depends upon the type of element used and the way in which the model is meshed. Among these steps the element selection and meshing are very important.

Elements Used

Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys
In modeling the trough unit the elements chosen were:
  • SOLID 65 for modeling the mortar layers and
  • SHELL 181 for modeling the chicken mesh and weld mesh layers.
The trough element modeled using ANSYS is shown in Figure 2

Calculation of Cracking Moment

  • Method I: (Ref 3)
    where,
    fr - modulus of rupture of cement mortar
  • Ig – Gross moment of Inertia
  • Yb – Neutral axis depth

  • Method II: (Ref 3)

    Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys

    where,
    frm - modulus of rupture ofmesh-mortar combination

    Ig – Gross moment of Inertia

    Yb – Neutral axis depth

  • Method III :( Ref 4)

    Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys

    where,
    fcr - modulus of rupture of cement mortar

    Ig – Gross moment of Inertia

    Yb – Neutral axis depth

  • Method IV :( Ref 1)

    Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys

    Mcr = a x fcu xZ

    where,

    α - Cracking Moment constant Characteristic compressive strength of mortar

    Z - Section modulus

    S = Percentage of reinforcement

    F = Percentage of flyash
Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys

Cracking Moment from ANSYS

The stress value from ANSYS is given below from which the Cracking Moment is calculated.

Stress at first visible crack = 14.740 N/mm2

Cracking Moment Mcr= 14.740 x (5956199.0 / 47.5)

= 1.857 KNm

Experimentally the Cracking Moment obtained at the first visible crack (Ref 8) was 1.075 KNm.

The comparison of Cracking Moment for 20 mm thick Ferrocement trough element by various methods with ANSYS results are given in Tables 1 to 4.

Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys

Development of Design Charts

Design charts are developed for ferrocement trough unit by varying the following parameters
  1. Thickness of the section,t: 20, 25, 30 &35 mm
  2. Characteristic compressive
    Strength of mortar, fcu : 35, 40, 45&50 N/mm2
  3. Mesh mortar parameter, x : 0.2 (4 layers of chicken mesh &1 layer of weld mesh), 0.25 (6 layers of chicken mesh &1 layer of weld mesh) & 0.30 (8 layers of chicken mesh &1 layer of weld mesh).
The calculation of mesh-mortar parameter "x" for the Ferrocement Trough Element with 4 Layers of Chicken Mesh and One Layer Weld Mesh is given below.

Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys

= 0.059 + 0.116
= 0.175
H" 0.200.

Design charts developed for ferrocement trough for various thicknesses of the specimen and the mortar strengths are given in Figures 3 to 8.

Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys
Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys
Ferrocement Roofing Elements Using Ansys

Conclusion

Based on the detailed analysis of Ferrocement trough units using ANSYS the following conclusions have been drawn:
  • The cracking moment by method 4 is found to be in good agreement with both the ANSYS and Experimental results.
  • The methods 1, 2, and 3 underestimated the cracking moment for the Ferrocement trough units.
  • From the results obtained from ANSYS design charts are developed for the ferrocement trough unit. The design charts developed in this paper will serve as an aid for the designer to arrive at a suitable section.

References

  • Andal, L. Palanichamy, M.s. Ponraj Shankar And Vaidyanathan, R.(2005) 'Behaviour of Ferrocement Flexural Member with Polymer Modified Mortar,' Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Concrete Composite and Structures (ICACS-2005) Jan 6-8.
  • Ramesht, M.H. And Vickridge, I.g.(1996) 'Faoferrs- A Computer Program for the Analysis of Ferrocement in Flexure,' Journal of Ferrocement Vol.26, No.1, pp.21 -31.
  • Balaji Rao, K.(2002)'Estimation of Cracking and Ultimate moments and load-deflection behavior of Ferrocement Elements', National seminar of Ferrocement 18-20 Feb' 2002 @ Anna University, Chennai. pp.G1– G10.
  • Mathews, M.S. Sheela, S. Seetharaman, P.R. And Sudhakumar, J.(1991) 'Analytical and Experimental Investigations of Hollow Ferrocement Roofing Units'.Journal of ferrocement. , Vol.27; NO.1, pp.1 -14.
  • Perumal, P. And Vidhyanathan, R.(1987) 'Strength and Corrosion Resistance of Ferrocement slabs', Proceedings of National Seminar on Modern trends in building materials, Design & Construction, Institution of Engineers (India) Allahabad, Nov.13-15.
  • Dr. Ramachandra Murthy, D.S. (2002) 'Low cost Housing in Ferrocement Technology,' National seminar of Ferrocement 18-20 Feb' 2002 @ Anna University, Chennai, pp. j1 – j8.
  • Rao, P.K. (1992) 'Stress-strain Behavior of Ferrocement Elements under Compression,' Journal of Ferrocement Vol.22, No. 4, pp.343 – 352.
  • Sujatha, T. (2005) 'Flyash based Ferrocement trough shaped roofing/ flooring element for low cost housing,' M.E. Thesis.
  • Damodar Maity, Kalita, U.C. And Nazrul Imam (2002) 'An Investigation On the Shape of Ferrocement Roofing Elements,' Journal of Ferrocement Vol.32, No. 4, pp. 271-284.
  • Naaman, A.E.'Ferrocement and Laminated Cementitious Composites,' Techno Press 3000, USA, pp.1471, 143 &145.
  • ACI Committee Report No. 549 'State–of–the–Art Report on Ferrocement,' ACI-549 -97, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Part 5, pp. 549.R-2.
  • ANSYS Help Manual (Version 8.0).

From the Editor

Structural Engineering Research centre at Roorkee/Ghaziabad carried out R&D work on ferrocement under the able guidance of its director Prof. G.S. Ramaswamy from 1968 onwards and a very large number of applications were developed and technology released for commercial use through NRDC. The Centre supported the activities of international ferrocement information centre A.I.T. Bangkok by deputing its experts for conducting Try Programme and preparation of do-it-yourselfManuals on tanks, Bins, Roofs, Boats, Bio Gas Plants etc. Large number of papers and manual were produced and the pre–patents were file. The technologies developed are in use by leading engineering department, pre–cast component Producers.
Concrete Rheology - Unveiling the Secrets of Concrete
Concrete is a heterogeneous composite complex material, and its hardened property is influenced by its fresh property. Concrete today has transformed into an advanced type with new and innovative ingredients added - either singly or in

Read more ...

ICRETE: Making Concrete Economical
ICRETE offers many benefits apart from reducing cement content and giving high grades saving to ready-mix concrete companies; it helps reduce shrinkage and permeability in concrete slabs, increases the durability of concrete, and also works

Read more ...

UltraTech Cement to implement Coolbrook’s RotoDynamic HeaterTM revolutionary technology for industrial electrification
UltraTech Cement Limited, India’s largest cement and ready-mix concrete (RMC) company, and Coolbrook, a transformational technology and engineering company, will jointly develop a project to implement Coolbrook’s RotoDynamic HeaterTM (RDH)

Read more ...

Plastic Shrinkage and Cracks in Concrete
Plastic shrinkage cracking occurs when fresh concrete is subjected to a very rapid loss of moisture. It is caused by a combination of factors such as air and concrete temperature, relative humidity, and wind velocity at the surface of concrete. These can cause

Read more ...

Mechanised way of plastering with spray Plaster Machine
This paper covers the research work carried out on cement plastering process for internal and external building wall by using spray plastering machine. Objective of study is to experiment and compare the plastering activity by conventional way and

Read more ...

Construction Defects Investigation & Remedies
In recent years, the speed of construction has increased very fast; buildings which used to take 3-5 years are now getting completed in 1-2 years. There is a race to complete projects faster, but due to this speedy construction, the quality of construction is often

Read more ...

Challenges in usage of Hydrogen in Cement Industry
With its zero-emission characteristics, hydrogen has become a promising decarbonization path for the cement industry. While there are several issues that need to be resolved in the use of hydrogen, there are also many advantages, so much so that the growth

Read more ...

Enhancing Corrosion Resistance of Steel Bars in Reinforced Concrete Structures
Reinforced concrete is a composite material which is made using concrete and steel bars. Concrete takes the compressive forces and steel bar takes tensile forces. Concrete around the steel bar protects it from corrosion by providing an alkaline environment

Read more ...

Moving toward workability retention to rheology retention with low viscosity concrete technology
Amol Patil, Sr. Specialist - General Manager (Admixture and Specialty Products), Master Builders Solutions (India), and Nilotpol KAR, Managing Director, Master Builders Solutions (South Asia), present a paper on the concept of low viscosity concrete in

Read more ...

Cement industry innovating eco-friendly packaging
Cement companies are constantly innovating to meet global sustainability standards and improve logistics, shelf life, and utility of cement, while reducing wastage. Thei aim is to reduce their environmental impact without compromising their product

Read more ...

IIT Madras uses Solar Thermal Energy to Recycle Waste concrete
Researchers at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras have developed a treatment process using solar thermal energy to recycle construction and demolition debris. Waste concrete from demolition was heated using solar radiation to produce recycled concrete

Read more ...

Textile Reinforced Concrete - A Novel Construction Material of the Future
As a new-age innovative building material, TRC is especially suited for maintenance of existing structures, for manufacturing new lightweight precast members, or as a secondary building material to aid the main building material. Textile Reinforced Concrete

Read more ...

Technological Innovation for Use of Bottom Ash by-product of Thermal Power Plants in the Production of Concrete
The day is not far for the adoption of this innovative, eco-friendly, and cost-effective bottom ash – concrete process technology by construction agencies undertaking road/infrastructure project works, real estate developers, ready mix concrete (RMC) operators

Read more ...

Headed Bars in Concrete Construction
Using headed bars instead of hooked bars offer several advantages like requirement of reduced development length, less congestion, ease of transport and fixing at site, better concrete consolidation, and better performance under seismic loads.

Read more ...

Sustainability of Cement Concrete - Research Experience at CRRI on Sustainability of Concrete from Materials Perspective
It can be said that ever since the publication of the document of World Commission on Environment and Development [1], the focus of the world has diverted towards sustainability. Gro Harlem Bruntland [1] defined sustainable development as “development

Read more ...

Shrinkage, Creep, Crack-Width, Deflection in Concrete
The effects of shrinkage, creep, crack-width, and deflection in concrete are often ignored by designers while designing structural members. These effects, if not considered in some special cases such as long span slabs or long cantilevers, may become very

Read more ...

Concrete Relief Shelve Walls - An Innovative Method of Earth Retention
Relief shelve walls are a unique concept that use only conventional construction materials like PCC / RCC / steel reinforcements, and work on a completely different fundamental to resist the lateral load caused due to soil. Information on the various dimensions

Read more ...

Carbon Neutrality in Cement Industry A Global Perspective
Increasing energy costs, overcapacity, and environmental pollution are the top concerns of the cement industry, which is one of the major contributors to CO2 emissions. Dr S B Hegde, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jain College of Engineering

Read more ...

Finnish company Betolar expands to Indian concrete markets with a cement-free concrete solution
Betolar, a Finnish start-up, and innovator of geopolymer concrete solution Geoprime®, has expanded its operations to Europe and Asian markets including India, Vietnam and Indonesia. Betolar’s innovation Geoprime® is the next-generation, low carbon

Read more ...

Why Fly Ash Bricks Are Better Than Clay/Red Bricks
It is estimated that in India each million clay bricks consume about 200 tons of coal and emit around 270 tons of CO2; on the other hand, with fly ash bricks production in an energy-free route, there are no emissions. Dr. N. Subramanian, Consulting

Read more ...