COMPARITIVE STUDY OF G+30 MULTISTOREYED STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITE, RCC AND STEEL BUILDING USING TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS
Mr. Dishant R. Prajapati PG student, Applied mechanics and structural Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, The M.S. University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Dr. D.R. Panchal Assistant professor, Applied Mechanics and Structural Engineering Department, Faculty of technology and Engineering, The M.S. University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
ABSTRACT:
In this present paper the comparative study of G+30 steel concrete composite, steel and RCC building is done using dynamic analysis i.e. time history analysis. Etabs structural package is used for the analysis. In case of composite building the encased column sections are used. The analysis is done using the IS 1893-2002.The time history analysis using total five ground motion earthquake data i.e. Bhuj, Kobe, Chamoli, Uttarkashi, Chamba were used in order to achieve the seismic response and the average response of all five ground motion database were compared for the above mentioned buildings. The nonlinear modal analysis (FNA) method were used for the analysis purpose. The parameters such as Base shear, Story drift and maximum top displacement are compared. Results shows that the composite building shows response nearly similar to the steel building. On the other hand, RCC building shows more response compared to steel and composite building.
Dr. D.R. Panchal Assistant professor, Applied Mechanics and Structural Engineering Department, Faculty of technology and Engineering, The M.S. University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
ABSTRACT:
In this present paper the comparative study of G+30 steel concrete composite, steel and RCC building is done using dynamic analysis i.e. time history analysis. Etabs structural package is used for the analysis. In case of composite building the encased column sections are used. The analysis is done using the IS 1893-2002.The time history analysis using total five ground motion earthquake data i.e. Bhuj, Kobe, Chamoli, Uttarkashi, Chamba were used in order to achieve the seismic response and the average response of all five ground motion database were compared for the above mentioned buildings. The nonlinear modal analysis (FNA) method were used for the analysis purpose. The parameters such as Base shear, Story drift and maximum top displacement are compared. Results shows that the composite building shows response nearly similar to the steel building. On the other hand, RCC building shows more response compared to steel and composite building.
This is a premium article available exclusively for our subscribers.
If you are already a subscriber, please Login
If not, subscribe now and get access to well researched articles & reports on infrastructure construction, equipment & machinery, innovations & technology, project reports, case studies, and more. All this by simply paying just ₹200/- for a month of complete portal access, or a discounted rate of ₹1000/- for a full year of access.
NBM&CW November 2017
